![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixSk75f5w_gk5HVvWWxsFMKB420ALcZc9GV9nSOvMIXEr5SbDyUi39N-qWimp0wfT9SpnOP711h08VrVZB0n013vvySFMTbFp9db8IoFHc7__giYsiO99cHajclShYV9Qw6a1-HRjTxP0/s200/rosenberg.jpg)
An interesting post by Justin Paterno examines David Rosenberg (former chief economist at Merrill Lynch) searches using the Google Insight tool, introduced in a previous post. Using the tool, a case can be made that David Rosenberg is a useful contrarian indicator.
But looking at Rosenberg's charts and thinking about what we are supposed to do as investors versus what the pundits tell us to do gives us better direction. Consider the following:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDqh4yD8k871Gf6_XaOouCMBYdCnYw80ZSytciSXWvCTqRi838EwoQJmAltWSm1NMvW-apE5QFsx5DOHxgPelCRbFKThypQiq_GgontyvcStXhjPh-tZ6oU7sq4luxUOHfDzZx1nc2_fs/s200/rosenberg+chart.jpg)
I believe that investors should put ear plugs in and look for really lousy macro economic charts and that is the time to get in. This presupposes you are a market timer. But all the evidence shows market timing is futile, and I accept the evidence.
As Warren Buffett might say: Do you want to buy a hamburger for 50 cents or a dollar. It will cost 50 cents when the economic outlook is murky, and a dollar when the economic outlook is clear. Which is the better deal?
ReplyDelete