Investment Help

If you are seeking investment help, look at the video here on my services. If you are seeking a different approach to managing your assets, you have landed at the right spot. I am a fee-only advisor registered in the State of Maryland, charge less than half the going rate for investment management, and seek to teach individuals how to manage their own assets using low-cost indexed exchange traded funds. Please call or email me if interested in further details. My website is at http://www.rwinvestmentstrategies.com. If you are new to investing, take a look at the "DIY Investor Newbie" posts here by typing "newbie" in the search box above to the left. These take you through the basics of what you need to know in getting started on doing your own investing.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Dividend Data for DIYers

Here is a table adapted from Barron's 6/15 issue, page M47, showing the quarterly year-over-year dividend payouts of stocks comprising the Dow Jones Industrial Average:



Company/Ticker
March 2014
March 2015
Am. Exp. (AXP)
.23
.26
Apple (APPL)
a
.47
AT&T (T)
.46
a
Boeing (BA)
.73
.91
Caterpillar (CAT)
.60
.70
Chevron (CVX)
1.00
1.07
Cisco (CSCO)
.19
.21
Coca-Cola (KO)
.305
.33
Disney (DIS)
Nil
Nil
Du Pont (D)
.45
.47
Exxon (XON)
.63
.69
Gen Elect (GE)
.22
.23
Goldman Sachs (GS)
.55
.60
Home Depot (HD)
.47
.59
IBM (IBM)
.95
1.10
Intel (INTC)
.225
.24
John&John (JNJ)
.66
.70
JPMorgan(JPM)
.38
.40
McDonalds(MCD)
.81
.85
Merck(MRK)
.44
.45
Microsoft(MSFT)
.28
.31
Nike(NKE)
.24
.28
Pfizer(PFE)
.26
.28
ProcGamble(PG)
.6015
.6436
3M(MMM)
.855
1.025
Travelers(TRV)
.50
.55
UnitedHealth(UNH)
.28
.375
UnitedTech((UTX)
.59
.64
Verizon(VZ)
.53
.55
Visa(V)
.40
.12
Wal-Mart(WMT)
.48
.49


Note that all except Visa increased their dividend.  Apple replaced AT&T, so their dividend experience isn't shown.  Overall dividends amounted to $103.65 compared to $91.94 a year earlier.  The yield increased from 2.22% to 2.25%.

For reference purposes, the yield on the 10-year Treasury is approximately 2.40%.


Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Retirement Calculator Review

Investor Junkie has written a nice review of Personal Capital's retirement calculator.  For those in retirement, or close to retirement, interested in a detailed analysis on whether they have enough to meet spending plans, the calculator appears to answer the outstanding questions.  Note that it is free but does require providing a lot of information.

For what it is worth, my approach is considerably simpler.  Take 4% on an inflation-adjusted basis, and check it every couple of years.

I was at an American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) a couple of years ago where a complicated Monte Carlo retirement analysis was presented.  One of the audience members stood up and said his approach was to do what he had done all his life - calculate a reasonable withdrawal rate and then adjust his spending so that he lived within his means.

The bottom line is that some people want more detail and, thus, the Personal Capital calculator may be exactly what they are looking for.  For others, the simpler approach will work better.  I also have to admit I am prejudiced against spreading bank info all over the internet - but that's just me.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Look Who's Indexing - Investment Pros

On 4/14 and 4/15, 1,280 Bloomberg terminal users were asked "what do you think is most appropriate for someone who is mid-career and trying to save for retirement?"  Bloomberg terminal users are professional managers.  The choices scored as follows:
  • 42% Passive index funds and etfs
  • 18% Actively managed mutual funds
  • 17% Individual stocks and funds
  • 14% Real estate
  • 3% Hedge funds
The study was reported by Charles Stein, Even Financial Pros Choose Indexing for Retirement Savings.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Bond ETF Performance Update

The last update of bond funds was done on

 12/29/2014.

The purpose here is to get a sense of how various parts of the fixed income market have performed year-to-date.  We are still in a world of historically low short-term yields heavily influenced by global Central Bank policy led by the U.S. Federal Reserve.  In fact, the number 1 issue in markets today is when the Fed will raise rates (we are beyond the "if" stage) and the path rates will follow from there.

Here are the total year-to-date returns through 5/29/2015 as reported by Morningstar.

The first point to note is that performance was fairly tight.  Not much, if anything, was gained from going off index, i.e. investing in other than AGG.

No advantage was gained by exploiting the yield curve as seen by the 1.68% return on IEI versus 1.66% on IEF.

Some incremental performance was garnered for investing in riskier funds as seen by the 3.03% return on the emerging market fund EMB and the 2.36% on HYS, a short-term high yield fund.

This data is provided for educational purposes.  My clients and I own some funds listed in the table.


Monday, May 25, 2015

Cheap Trick

No, this isn't about the 70's rock band (still apparently going strong).  It is about a financial services industry cheap trick.

The lady was from Texas and called with a bit of concern in her voice.  She was selling land that had been in the family for a long time and was getting approximately $13 million.  In hand, she had a proposal to manage the $13 million and was seeking a second opinion.

The proposal wasn't from an asset manager but actually from an advisor who finds asset managers.  In other words, an asset gatherer.  He was from a large network of advisors who gather assets.  He is a middleman.  In other words, if you were selling or buying a house, you can go directly to a realtor or you can go to an advisor who would recommend a realtor.  If people fall for it, the industry would put on as many layers as they could get away with!

The cheap trick, in my opinion (you can make up your own mind), comes in the fee proposal:

As you look at this fee proposal, recall one of the well-known tricks discovered by behavioral finance researchers.  It goes like this:  if you want someone to donate $1, first ask for $2.  Then, after a pause, when you say you have a lower level of participation ($1), you are likely to get it.

Here, when the client is shown the big discount, it looks like they are getting a good deal with the much lower proposed fee.  What needs to be asked is how many clients this advisor has paying the "Standard Fee."  I would be willing to bet he has nobody paying 2.90% and 2.70%, etc.

At 0.98% of $13 million, the fee for 12 months would amount to $127,000 FOR THE FIRST YEAR!
The next question to put to the advisor would be who gets what?  My guess would be that the investment managers would get approximately 0.60% and the advisor/asset gatherer would get a cool 0.38%.

The rest of the proposal is just as laughable (or sad, depending on how you are looking at it).  The asset allocation is based on an 8-question allocation questionnaire.  The end result is 2 asset categories specified to 2 decimal places.  To the uninitiated, it looks very scientific.

But none of the questions asks about her goal for the funds.  In a short conversation with me, she indicated she intended a chunk of the funds was earmarked to go to heirs.  Did the advisor explain to her that her heirs have a considerably longer investment horizon and, therefore, assets intended for them should be invested in other than municipal bonds (especially given the 0.98% investment fee)!


Friday, May 22, 2015

Look Who's Indexing - Scott Adams

Scott Adams, the creator of "Dilbert," has made a career out of exposing incompetence.  His laugh-out-loud cartoon series makes fun of the business world in a way that is highly recognizable by anyone who has spent any time in an office environment.

Similarly he has strong words to say about active investment management and touts the passive management approach.

Here is his response (from the Wall Street Journal) to whom he would recommend active investment management:  Scott Adams:  It's a Perfect Strategy for My Enemies.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Look Who's Indexing - Greg Mankiw

Greg Mankiw teaching
I've decided to start a list of well-known people who index.  The obvious impetus is to show readers they are far from alone in choosing to index their nest egg investments.

Who is Greg Mankiw (pronounced "man q")?  He is head of the economics department at Harvard University, former head of the Council of Economic Advisors to president George W. Bush, and author of the best-selling economics text books used in introductory economics classes in the U.S.  He is also author of the popular Greg Mankiw's Blog.

Incidently, those interested in an introductory economics text would enjoy Mankiw's texts; BUT, unless you are made of money, I would recommend buying an older edition.  The latest edition which is required at many colleges is pricey and the texts typically don't change a whole lot in moving to the latest edition.  There are a number of inexpensive listings on eBay--just be sure to get a "Principles" text.  Mankiw also writes some advanced texts for use in graduate courses.